ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
MINUTES, FEBRUARY 18, 2003
The School Board of Escambia County, Florida, convened in Public Forum at 5:30 p.m., in Room 160, at the J.E. Hall Educational Services Center, 30 East Texar Drive, Pensacola, Florida, with the following present:
Chair: Ms. Linda Finkelstein
Vice Chair: Mrs. Cary Stidham
Board Members: Mrs. Carissa Bergosh
Mr. Ronnie L. Clark
Dr. John DeWitt
School Board Attorney: Mr. Francisco M. Negron, Jr.
Superintendent of Schools: Mr. Jim Paul
Ms. Finkelstein called the Public Forum to order at 5:30 p.m. She welcomed Mrs. Carissa Bergosh, who had been installed as School Board Member, District I, at the January 27, 2003 Special Workshop. (NOTE: Mrs. Bergosh, wife of Mr. Gary Bergosh, School Board Member, District I, was appointed by Governor Jeb Bush to serve on the School Board in her husband’s absence, which was due to his call to active duty as a Marine Corps officer.) Ms. Finkelstein also noted that Mrs. Stidham had been elected (at the January 27, 2003 Special Workshop) to replace Mr. Bergosh as vice-chair for the remainder of the 2002-2003 term.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mr. Darriel White gave the invocation and Mrs. Bergosh led the pledge of allegiance.
PUBLIC FORUM
The Board recognized the following speakers who addressed various subjects:
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “A”)
Name Issue
Angie Shilkett Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Madonna Jackson-Williams “Read Across America”
LeRoy Boyd Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High*
Jerry McIntosh Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High*
Kirstin Norris Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Belinda Donaldson “Huckleberry Finn” (Evaluation of Curricula Tools, Item VII.B.1)/Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Doris Hayes Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Jethro Muhammad Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High*
Glenda Patten Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Debra Norris Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Andrew Avery Student Dress (Item VII.A.b.1)
Roosevelt Crosby Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High*
*This issue was later addressed as an item under “Items from the Board.” The item, entitled “Repeal of the Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High,” was added at the request of Mr. Clark during “Adoption of the Agenda.”
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ms. Finkelstein called the Regular Meeting to order at 5:58 p.m.
II. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
The Superintendent listed the additions, deletions, amendments and corrections to the agenda. (see margin notes) [NOTE: The following motion refers to discussion from the February 17, 2003 Regular Workshop, regarding the Board’s desire to move the section “Proposed Additions or Revisions to School District Rules” (currently under “New Business”) forward on Regular Meeting agendas, as the first item after “Adoption of the Agenda.”] Motion was made by Dr. DeWitt, seconded by Mrs. Stidham, to “move public hearings on proposed rules forward on the agendas,” as the first item after “Adoption of Agenda.” Ms. Finkelstein explained that the purpose of the motion was prevent individuals wishing to speak during public hearings on proposed rules, from “having to wait until the end of the agenda to speak.” Motion was approved unanimously. *
Mr. Clark requested that an item entitled “Repeal of the Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High,” be added under section VII.B “Items from the Board.” On motion made by Dr. DeWitt and seconded by Mrs. Stidham, adoption of the agenda as amended, was unanimously approved.
*As a result of Board action, the following section was moved forward on the agenda:
VII.A. PROPOSED ADDITIONS OR REVISONS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT RULES
a. Permission to Advertise
DELETED
1. Notice of Intent to Advertise Amendment to
School District Rule 6Gx17-3.02(7) – Student Transfer
Policy
DELETED
2. Notice of Intent to Advertise Amendment to
School District Rule 6Gx17-5.05 – N.B. Cook Elementary School
Auditorium and Cafeteria Rental for Non-School Use of Educational
Facilities
3. Notice of Intent to Advertise the Name of the New K-8 Elementary School in Molino “Dogwood Elementary”
Motion by Mrs. Stidham, seconded by Mrs. Bergosh, to approve for advertising, “Dogwood Elementary,” as the name of the new K-8 elementary school in Molino, was unanimous.
b. Permission to Adopt
1. Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment to School District Rule 6Gx17 – 7.02 – Student Dress
Motion was made by Dr. DeWitt, seconded by Mrs. Stidham, to adopt School District Rule 6Gx17-7.02 – Student Dress. Dr. DeWitt made the following statement: “During the past four months this community has explored many issues related to the development of a student dress for the students in the Escambia County School System. Certainly, no single issue has brought forth more comments, from students, parents and the community at large. Such involvement in the matters of our public schools is refreshing and encouraging. As a result of that involvement, we have examined a variety of options, including strict dress codes, uniforms and implementation issues. I have learned in the past four months that most everyone really cares about the matter of student dress, that feelings run strong from one side of the issue to the other, and that, to say the least, there is much room for varying views. All of us on this Board have seen our fair share of letters, emails, and phone calls on this single issue. (And, I am happy to report that the quality of letters received from students, should help rise the writing score on the FCAT, as many have been well written and their content well-constructed.) In addition, teachers have seized the opportunity to use this public debate as a learning experience about participatory democracy. We have seen many of these students speak before us here at the board meeting. I am a firm believer that with leadership comes a responsibility to always review the issues, listen to the public, to do our research, and to be open to the possibility of alternatives that can accomplish our goals. In this instance, our concerns is to insure our students are appropriately dressed in school in order to provide a safe and positive learning and teaching environment. It is obvious to me, that at this time, a mandatory district-wide policy regarding uniforms, would not accomplish that goal but would in fact distract many students, parents and teachers from our true mission of providing a quality education for all of our students. I continue to believe strongly that a consistent or a uniform dress code is a sound policy for this district, but it is apparent that without a broader base of support (especially from parents), and without a commitment to enforce a district wide dress code, a mandatory uniform policy makes little sense at this time. But, take heed: to be truly successful any policy regarding student dress must rely on the dedicated implementation and enforcement by school-based administrators and faculty. For this reason, I would move the following substitute motion:
1) That two committees (elementary and secondary) be formed under the direction of the Superintendent with board appointees to develop an appropriate dress code for each respective level. The committee should consider and develop an enforceable discipline policy, which will be administered under the Superintendent’s authority, and carried out by school-based staff. The dress code should be presented to the Board for review with sufficient time to permit full incorporation into the 2003-2004 edition of the District student’s rights and responsibilities handbook; and
2) That the Superintendent develop an alternative plan, by which each school may opt to adopt a uniform policy with the approval of at least 60% of the parents voting in the uniform election. The uniform policy shall consist of one district-wide uniform, and at least one other uniform acceptable to the school’s parents. The policy should be developed so that uniform election is completed no later than May 1, 2003.
Mrs. Bergosh seconded the substitute motion. Upon inquiry by Mrs. Stidham, Dr. DeWitt stated that the committees referred to in the substitute motion were the same committees mentioned by the Superintendent at the February 17, 2003 Regular Workshop. Dr. DeWitt stated that “everyone who has spoken (about the issue of student dress), agrees that ‘something’ should be enforced, whether it be a strict dress code of a uniform policy.” He noted that the proposal outlined in the substitute motion would allow each school to “make their own decision.” The Superintendent agreed with the proposal outlined in the substitute motion and stated that he intended to present a recommendation regarding student dress, at the April Regular Meeting.
The Board recognized the following speakers who addressed various aspects of this issue: Judson Searcy, Carolyn Kulb, Paula Pulaski, Sheree Domine, Tammy Hunter, Sarah Watson, Steven Tuley, Marcia McCrary, Chris Werra, Clinton Powell, C.J. Donaldson, LaToya Archibald, Sheila Romaine. *
*In response to comments made by Ms. Romaine, Mr. Negron advised that “the purpose of this public hearing, is for the public to give input on proposed rules. To suggest that a rule cannot be changed by the Board during the public hearing or as a result of the input it receives (from the public), is to then render the public hearing process meaningless. So yes, the Board can at this time, modify their rules.”
Mrs. Stidham and Mr. Clark expressed their continued support of uniforms. Mr. Clark believed, “if we’re ever going to solve the problem we’re dealing with, we’re going to have to eventually go to uniforms.” Substitute motion was approved 4 to 1, with Mr. Clark voting “No.”
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. 12-12-02 REGULAR WORKSHOP
2. 12-17-02 REGULAR MEETING
3. 01-13-03 SPECIAL MEETING
DELETED 4.
01-17-03 REGULAR WORKSHOP
DELETED 5.
01-21-03 REGULAR MEETING
6. 01-23-03 SPECIAL MEETING
7. 01-27-03 SPECIAL WORKSHOP
8. 01-27-03 SPECIAL MEETING
9. 01-30-03 SPECIAL MEETING
10. 01-31-03 SPECIAL MEETING (EXECUTIVE SESSION)
Motion made by Dr. DeWitt, seconded by Mrs. Stidham, to approve the minutes as listed (Items 1 through 3 and Items 6 through 10), was unanimous.
IV. COMMITTEE/DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
1. Stellar Employee Recognition
The Superintendent announced that Mrs. Janet Schilling, Administrative Clerk, Lipscomb Elementary School, was the Stellar Employee for the month of February. Mrs. Schilling received a plaque and pin from the School District and a check in the amount of $100 donated by Members First Credit Union.
2. PTA Presentation
Ms. Karen Pope, President, Escambia County Council PTA (ECCPTA), gave a brief update of the recent and upcoming activities of the PTA and expressed her appreciation to the Board and the Superintendent for their support.
3. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) for Facilities – Cary Stidham
Mrs. Stidham stated that the committee met at Ferry Pass Elementary School to take a look at the newly constructed media center that was made possible by funds from the ‘One-Half Cent Sales Tax’. The committee also discussed “facilities” items that were pending for this meeting and recommended approval of those items.
4. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) for Human Resources and Minority Recruitment and Retention – Ronnie Clark
Mr. Clark stated that the committee had recently met for the first time and discussed issues related to “human resources” and “minority recruitment and retention.” He thanked each Board Member for their appointment of such “diverse” members to the committee.
5. Citizens Advisory Committee for Technology and Curriculum – John DeWitt and Linda Finkelstein
Dr. DeWitt noted that the committee had previously requested that they be involved in the review of all magnet school programs. He stated that at the last meeting, the committee received magnet school program updates from Ferry Pass Elementary Math-Science Magnet School and the Culinary Arts Program at Pine Forest High School.
ADD 6. Resolution for “Escambia County Dads in School Week”
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Escambia County’s fatherhood committee has a focused Fatherhood Initiative which seeks to increase the awareness of the importance of fathers in the lives of their children; and
WHEREAS, research has indicated that while both parents provide needed support in the lives of children, dads play a vital role in their children’s development as well as their educational success; and
WHEREAS, dads are necessary for the healthy development of their children and dads or other father figures should be encouraged to actively participate in the education of their children;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the School Board of Escambia County does hereby proclaim the week of February 17-21, 2003 as
DADS IN SCHOOLS WEEK
and encourages fathers, stepfathers, grandfathers and other father figures to meet with their children one day a week for lunch or visits to the classroom, and encourages employers to allow men time to visit their children at school.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be spread upon the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board and a copy tendered to Judy Miller.
Motion by Dr. DeWitt, seconded by Mrs. Stidham, to adopt the resolution for “Escambia County Dads in School Week,” was unanimously approved.
V. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items were pulled from the Consent Agenda for separate vote: Item V.B.8 by Mrs. Bergosh and Item V.D.18 by Mrs. Stidham. On motion by Dr. DeWitt and second by Mrs. Stidham, the Consent Agenda, except for items pulled, was unanimously approved.
A. Curriculum and Instruction
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “B”)
Approved:
1. Cooperative Agreement for Service between the School Board of Escambia County, Florida and the School Board of Okaloosa County, Florida
DELETED 2. Item
pulled after number assigned
3. School Advisory Council Additions/Deletions
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Services Grant
5. Cooperative Agreement between the School Board of Escambia County, Florida and Pensacola Electrical Apprenticeship, Group Non-Joint
B. FINANCE
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “C”)
Approved:
1. Authorization for payrolls and vouchers for the month of March 2003
2. Check Register for the month of January 2003
3. Financial Statement for the month of January 2003
4. Financial Status Report
5. Legal Services:
Summary of all legal expenses
6. Legal Services:
General Fund
a) Hammons, Longoria & Whittaker, P.A. $ 1,350.50
b) Hammons, Longoria & Whittaker, P.A. $ 54.00
c) George Loomis $250.60
d) Gregory P. Farrar $400.00
7. Legal Services:
a) Hammons, Longoria & Whittaker, P.A. $ 9,272.50
b) Hammons, Longoria & Whittaker, P.A. $ 690.00
8. Budget Amendments
a) Resolution 4: General Operating Fund
b) Resolution 4: Other Special Revenue Fund
c) Resolution 5: Capital Projects Fund
d) Resolution 1: Special Revenue – Food Service
Motion made by Mrs. Bergosh, seconded by Dr. DeWitt, to table this item (“Budget Amendments”) until the February 26, 2003 Special Meeting, was unanimously approved.
9. Disposal of Capitalized and Non-Capitalized Assets:
a) Auction Lists I and II for February 2003
b) Scrap Lists I and II for February 2003
c) Request permission to auction a house constructed by George Stone students
10. Escambia County District School Board Audit Report No. 03-110 General Purpose Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002
C. HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “D”)
Approved:
1. Instructional/Professional
a. Appointments
NAME POSITION DATE WORK LOCATION
Arnold, Peggy Teacher 01/21/03 Pensacola High
Cohan, Suzanne IB Counselor 01/24/03 Pensacola High(part-time)
Overstreet, Paige Speech Language Pathologist 02/04/03 Holm/Warrington Elem
Pelfrey, Theresa Teacher 12/16/02 Century
Schneider, Robert Teacher 12/16/02 Pensacola High
Smith, Jeremy Teacher 01/13/03 Boy’s Base
Vowell, Jenny Counselor 01/06/03 Ferry Pass Elem
b. Reappointments
1. Annual
-None
2. Professional
-None
3. 4th Year Annual
-None
c. Transfers
NAME FROM TO DATE
Hill, Shirley Brownsville Warrington Elem 01/09/03
Stevens, Angela Navy Point McMillan Ctr 01/27/03
d. Out-of-Field
1. Appointments
-None
2. Reappointments
-None
3. Transfers
-None
4. Other
-None
e. Resignations/Retirements
Bergosh, Carissa teacher on LOA Bellview Elem 01/24/03
Castillo, Marlen teacher Spencer Bibbs 12/20/02
Floyd-Neeley, Georgette teacher Dixon Ed Ctr 01/31/03 (Dis Ret)
Gossage, Flavius psychologist Hall Center 02/28/03 (Ret)
Hood, Brian teacher Blue Angels 02/14/03
Johnson, Jessica teacher West Pensacola 02/07/03
Lee, Ethel teacher Wedgewood 01/31/03 (Ret)
f. Special Requests
1. Request approval for leave of absence without pay for the following personnel:
*Flannigan, Hanna teacher/Ferry Pass Elem 01/30/03-03/12/03
*Hauser, Valerie teacher/Ransom 01/28/03-04/21/03
*Jackson, Lisa teacher/Semmes 01/10/03-04/04/03
*Romano, Nancy speech therapist/Holm 01/21/03-01/31/03
Shannon, Ruth teacher/Brentwood Mid 01/27/03-03/14/03
*FMLA
2. The following instructional personnel are returning from leave of absence:
Susan Hoehn teacher/Workman 02/10/03
3. Request approval for Crystal Pruitt to be a Community Involvement Assistant at Navy Point Elementary School from February 3, 2003 through May 2, 2003. She will be paid $9.00 per hour, seven (7) hours per week, from the Governor’s Mentoring Initiative Grant.
4. Request approval for the following Speech Language Pathologists to be transferred from the instructional salary schedule to the professional salary schedule effective December 16, 2002:
Herber, Sammi
Zepp, Shelley
5. Request approval for the following instructional personnel to work in the “Beyond the
School Day Program” beginning November 2002 through May 2003. They are to be paid
at their regular hourly rate of pay from Title I funds:
Sonya Addison Kathryn Lovely-Payne
Rosa Dean Stella Williams
Curtis Farmer Charro Wongittillin
Carolyn Jones Jeanice Lewis
6. Request approval to place the vacant Administrative Clerk II and the Learning Resource
Specialist (TSA) positions in the FDLRS Department from Okaloosa County. Also request
that those positions be transferred from Okaloosa County to Escambia County effective February 19, 2003.
2. Educational Support Personnel
a. Appointments
NAME JOB TITLE EFF DATE LOCATION
Edgecumbe, Robert Tch Asst Spec 01/15/2003 County Jail
Hunt, Karin Tch Asst Spec 01/21/2003 Ferry Pass El
Norman, Rachel Educ Interpreter 01/21/2003 Workman
Reeves, Maria Cust Wrkr I 01/31/2003 Blue Angels
Smith, Belinda Early Ch Asst 01/29/2003 McMillan
(NOTE: All positions were advertised prior to the hiring freeze and approved to be filled.)
b. Resignations/Retirements
NAME JOB TITLE EFF DATE LOCATION
Bickerstaff, Rachel (Ret) Admin Clk III 01/21/2003 Risk Mgmt
Boslet, Beth Fd Service Asst I 01/06/2003 Beulah
Chouinard, Philip Cust Wrkr I 01/17/2003 Pine Forest
Hill, Keith Maintenance Wrkr I 01/28/2003 ESEAL
King, Henry Cust Wrkr I 01/17/2003 Washington
Sherman, Joyce (Ret) Tea Asst 12/31/2002 West Pensacola *
Whitehead, Dorothy (Ret) Sch Finance Spec 01/31/2003 Workman
* Documents completed and submitted to Human Resources 01/22/03
c. Terminations
Brooks, Myrtice Tea Asst Spec 01/31/2003 Transportation
Osborn, Michael Sch Bus Oper 01/31/2003 Transportation
Smith, Annette Cust Wrkr I 01/27/2003 Brentwood Elem
Worthey, Octavia Fd Service Asst I 01/31/2003 Spencer Bibbs
d. Suspensions
ADD- Employee #8601-9620-23, School Bus Operator, Transportation, be suspended without pay for five (5) working days effective February 19, 2003, for misconduct.
e. Dismissals
- Employee # 7101-0521-9, Food Service Assistant I, Tate High, be dismissed effective February 19, 2003, for misconduct.
f. Leave of Absence
Anderson, Cathy (Ext) Early Ch Asst/Bellview El 01/18/03-05/28/03 Personal
Barrington, Mary Cust Wrkr I/Pl Grove 02/03/03-05/30/03 Maternity *
Clausell, Gloria Tea Asst/Brentwood El 01/22/03-05/22/03 Personal
Collins, Charlotte Tea Asst Sp/Carver 02/03/03-05/22/03 Personal
Corner, Thelma Tea Asst Sp/Brentwood El 01/27/03-04/18/03 Medical *
Fennell, Patrice Tea Asst Sp/Esc Westgate 02/03/03-04/29/03 Medical *
Jones, Janice Tea Asst/West Pensacola 01/21/03-03/31/03 Personal *
Mills, Nancy Fd Serv Asst I/Myrtle Grove 02/03/03-05/23/03 Medical *
Moore, Vivien (Ext) Sch Bus Oper/Trans 01/08/03-02/24/03 Medical
Osborne, Cynthia (Ext) Tea Asst/Juv Justice 01/02/03-05/23/03 Personal
Smith, Tracey Early Ch Asst/Longleaf 02/04/03-05/23/03 Personal
Taylor, Trina Tea Asst Spec/Ransom 01/30/03-05/23/03 Personal
Wiggins, Patrick (Ext) Cust Wrkr I/Brentwood El 02/01/03-03/01/03 Medical
Woodward, Holly Tea Asst Spec/Esc Westgate 02/06/03-04/02/03 Medical *
*FMLA
g. Special Requests
ADD - Reinstate John Reeves as Plumber I, Maintenance Department, to satisfy return to work agreement effective February 19, 2003.
3. Risk Management
a. Trailer Resident - Pensacola High School
DELETED b. 457(b)
Deferred Compensation
Plan
4. Employee Services
a. Memorandum of Understanding between Escambia District School Board and EEC/CA – Regarding Implementation of the Requirements of the Reauthorization of the ESEA (No Child Left Behind) as it relates to Paraprofessionals.
5. Affirmative Action
DELETED a. Educational
Equity Act Annual Update
D. Purchasing
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “E”)
Approved:
1. Bid Renewal/Extension: Reconditioning of Football Equipment, Bid #002804
2. Annual Copier Maintenance Service Plan Renewal for District Print Shop
3. Annual Agreement Extension: Teacher Applicant/Certification System Software Maintenance and Support
4. Advanced Placement Testing Materials for Pensacola High School
5. Weight Room Mats for Tate High School
6. Student Desks for Wedgewood Middle School and West Pensacola Elementary School
7. Tables and Chairs for Family & Consumer Sciences Department at Various Schools
8. Fluke Networks Professional Switch Vision Suite
9. Computer Network Upgrade at Bailey Middle School
10. Dell Computers for Woodham High School
11. Five Year Copier Rental Agreement for FDLRS
12. Epson PowerLite Projectors for Various Schools
13. Floor Covering at Escambia Westgate Center
14. Asbestos Consulting Services for Escambia High School
15. Engineering Services for Tate and Washington High Schools
DELETED 16. Cafeteria
Management and Accountability Software/Hardware
17. Change Notice #1 to Purchase Order #240586 (ReHab Works, Inc.)
18. Change Notice #1 to Purchase Order #240608 (Aon Consulting Co.)
(NOTE: This issue was previously discussed at the February 17, 2003 Regular Workshop.) Motion was made by Mrs. Stidham, seconded by Dr. DeWitt, to postpone this item [Change Notice #1 to Purchase Order #240608 (Aon Consulting Co.)] until “further detail on previously submitted charges is received.” Mrs. Stidham stated that in researching concerns expressed at the February 17, 2003 Regular Workshop regarding this issue, she found that invoices that had previously been submitted Aon Consulting Co., “lacked detail.” She stated that she had “no idea as to what they (Aon Consulting, Co.) are actually billing us for,” and would need detailed information on previously submitted invoices before approving a change notice. She believed that Aon should be able to provide such information and noted that “though they are saying they need an additional $25,000 to complete their work, we have no idea what they are billing us for to make a determination if that $25,000 increase is necessary.” Upon inquiry by Dr. DeWitt, Mr. Joe Bernard, Director of Risk Management, stated that “itemized billing” of previously submitted invoices could be provided by the February 26, 2003 Special Meeting. Mrs. Stidham amended her motion to postpone this item [Change Notice #1 to Purchase Order #240608 (Aon Consulting Co.)] until the February 26, 2003 Special Meeting, “at which time, detailed information on previously submitted charges is to be received.” Amended motion was seconded by Dr. DeWitt and unanimously approved.
19. Bid Award: Byrneville Elementary School Window Replacement
20. Bid Award: Cordova Park Elementary School Additions/Renovations to Site-Work
21. Bid Award: Cordova Park Elementary School Renovations to Interiors and Mechanical Systems
22. Bid Award: Escambia High School Closed Circuit Television/Digital Security System
23. Bid Award: Escambia Westgate HVAC Renovations, Phase II
24. Bid Award: Holm Elementary School Asphalt/Hard Court
25. Bid Award: West Pensacola Elementary School ESE Suite HVAC Upgrade
26. Annual Agreement: Civil Engineering Services
27. Annual Agreement: Structural Engineering Services
28. Annual Agreement: Electrical Engineering Services
29. Annual Agreement: Mechanical Engineering Services
30. Annual Agreement: Architectural Services
31. Annual Agreement Renewal/Extension: Environmental Engineering Services
32. Annual Agreement Renewal/Extension: Geotechnical & Subsurface Investigation Services
33. Annual Agreement Renewal/Extension: Land Surveying Services
34. Change Notice #1 to Purchase Order #241568 (MEP Engineering Solutions, Inc.)
35. Change Notice #3 to Purchase Order #235550 (R. D. Ward Construction Co., Inc.)
CORRECTED 36. Change Notice #2 to Purchase Order #233725 (Reynolds Construction Co., Inc.)
37. Change Notice #7 to Purchase Order #235750 (Greenhut Construction Co., Inc.)
38. Additional ODP Material for Molino/Barrineau Park K-8 School
39. Change Notice #2 to Purchase Order #239245 (A. E. New Jr., Inc.)
E. Operations
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “F”)
Approved:
1. Facilities Planning
A. Final Payments
1. Safety and Healthy Educational Environment
2. General Renovations and Site Work at Warrington Middle and Tate High Schools
B. Miscellaneous
DELETED
1. Pre-Qualification of Contractors
AMENDED 2. Pre-Qualification of Contractors
2. Maintenance
-No items submitted
3. Transportation
-No items submitted
4. School Food Services
-No items submitted
F. Student Transfers
(Supplementary Minute Book, Exhibit “G”)
G. Internal Auditing
1. internal Funds
-No items submitted
2. Inventory Adjustment Reports
-No items submitted
3. Other
-No items submitted
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
-No items submitted
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. PROPOSED ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT RULES
*As a result of Board action, this section was moved forward on the agenda after “Adoption of the Agenda (Item II).”
B. ITEMS FROM THE BOARD
1. Evaluation of Curricula Tools – Cary Stidham
WHEREAS, The School Board of Escambia County is committee to the continuance of quality learning for all students; and
WHEREAS, Quality learning in the language arts can be achieved through a rich, diverse and varied curriculum that includes the use of appropriate media, texts and other materials; and
WHEREAS, It is the Board’s desire to empower teachers to encourage and promote quality learning by the selection of suitable media, texts and supplemental materials that may enrich the learning experience of students and contribute positively to the academic process; and
WHEREAS, It is essential that stakeholders, including teachers, administrators, parents and community members, be part of the process for the review and selection of classroom media texts, and supplemental materials,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA:
The School Board reaffirms its official position as set forth in the Educational Media Services Handbook (Version 01-02).
(NOTE: The following issue was previously discussed at the February 17, 2003 Regular Workshop.) Motion was made by Mrs. Stidham, seconded by Dr. DeWitt, to adopt “A Resolution of the School Board of Escambia County, Florida, Reaffirming School Board Policy for Media Selection.” Mrs. Stidham made the following statement: “Sometimes, we get so caught up in emotions, that we don’t look at the ‘big picture’. We might be so concerned about why things happen and how things happen and try to find someone to blame for perceived criticism, that we stray from the true point. I don’t want this issue of ‘Huckleberry Finn’ to detract from the ‘big picture’ – the ‘big picture’ is the fact that one parent or two, depending on to whom you are talking, complained about ‘Huckleberry Finn’. As a result of that single complaint, not only was this teachers’ study halted in her classroom at Ransom Middle School, but an edict went out from administration, to all elementary and middle schools, declaring ‘Huckleberry Finn’ unsuitable for classroom teaching. Since that time, different rationales have been presented for this reasoning. First, administration has said that ‘Huckleberry Finn’ is taught in eleventh grade and we do not want to bore students with materials they may have encountered previously in their academic careers. This rationale is not convincing, given that barely over 50% of language arts teachers actually teach ‘Huckleberry Finn’ in the eleventh grade. Second, the administration alleges that because the teacher did not follow policy, the administration did not have to follow policy either, when it decided to remove the ‘challenged material’ – two wrongs do not make a right, especially not in this case, where an entire class had to abruptly stop a project that was nearly completed. Such a sudden break in a lesson or a project can not be considered academically sound. I’m also concerned that the administration may have an in correct view of their obligations under Board rules. It seems there is a perception that when one portion of a policy is not followed by a subordinate, then the whole policy is void and does not have to be followed by the administration. Such as perception does not make for good practice. But even if we deliberate over policy all day long, I still do not understand how this policy issue translates into a general decree that ‘Huckleberry Finn’ cannot be taught in a classroom in elementary and middle schools – that is the ‘big picture’. Is it academically sound, for one incident and one parent’s complaint, to drive suddenly the curricula choices of an entire district? Should my lone opinion drive curriculum? On the flip side, should two or three district-level administrators sitting in isolation be able to make decisions on what is allowed in the classroom without Board or public input? School Board policy clearly says ‘no’, and for good reason – educators often differ on what is considered best practices when it comes to teaching a variety of subjects. For each administrator that says ‘Huckleberry Finn’ is inappropriate for middle school, I can show you the professional opinion of just as many others that believe it is appropriate and indeed, an essential part of the middle school curriculum. Curricula choices are difficult – they should be the subject of review and careful consideration, but they should never be based on a knee-jerk reaction to what one or even a few parents find objectionable. These choices should be based on sound academic policy with the input of teachers, principals and community members.” Mrs. Stidham noted that her motion was simply to reaffirm Board policy as set forth in the Educational Media Services Handbook. The policy indicates that teachers can assign supplementary material (including “Huckleberry Finn”) as long as they get their principal’s permission beforehand and outlines a process for review, if there are objections to materials being used in the classroom. Mrs. Bergosh stated that while the policy (as outlined in the Educational Media Services Handbook) must be enforced by both the teacher and the District, she also believed that the District “must be sensitive to the needs of our students and our parents.” She noted that ‘Huckleberry Finn’ was currently a part of high school curriculum and believed that it “would continue to enrich a more mature student audience.” She stated that she would not support the motion on the floor. The Superintendent stated that he had no problem with the resolution as outlined, as it merely confirmed the present process. He noted however, that there were several things mentioned in the statement by Mrs. Stidham that he believed were inaccurate, and stated for the record that “the book (“Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”) was never banned.” Mr. Clark stated that while the policy (as outlined in the Educational Media Service Handbook) should be followed, he also believed that “if administrators approve a book that has a sensitive nature, they should monitor the classroom to ensure that it is being carried out in a proper way.” He stated that he would support the motion on the floor.
The Board recognized the following speakers who addressed various aspects of this issue: Jerry McIntosh, Daniel Colbert, Walter Gulley, Jr., and Susan Watson.
Motion was approved 4 to 1, with Mrs. Bergosh voting “No.”
ADD 2. Repeal of Superintendent’s Decision Regarding the Banning of Farrakhan Speech at Pensacola High
[NOTE: The following discussion refers to the Superintendent’s denial of a request by the Pensacola Study Group, a Nation of Islam affiliate, to use the Pensacola High School auditorium to air a satellite downlink of a live speech by Minister Louis Farrakhan. (The broadcast, entitled “America at the Crossroads: War is Not the Answer,” was to take place Sunday, February 23, 2003.) The Superintendent issued the following statement in a news release regarding this issue: “I have denied the request based upon the fact that Mr. Farrakhan’s message is clearly decisive, hateful and most inflammatory. I cannot in good conscience, allow taxpayer-purchased facilities to be used as forum for such rhetoric.”] Motion was made by Mr. Clark, seconded by Dr. DeWitt, to repeal the Superintendent’s denial of a request by the Pensacola Study Group, to use the Pensacola High School auditorium to air a satellite downlink of a live speech by Minister Louis Farrakhan. Mr. Clark stated “one of the things we cannot do, that will put us in jeopardy, is decide who can or cannot speak, when we allow many other organizations, religious organizations, to use the facility.” He noted that he did not necessarily agree with Mr. Farrakhan’s messages either, however he did not believe that the Board could “stop people from speaking because we don’t like their message.” The Superintendent stated that “the question is not whether or not Louis Farrakhan can say what he says, much of which I believe is evil – he can say that where he want to say that, but the question is, can he do it in a public school?” The Superintendent noted that Board policy gives the Superintendent the authority to refuse the use of any facility to any group.
The Board recognized the following speakers who addressed various aspects of this issue: Marcia McCrary, and LeRoy Boyd.
Dr. DeWitt stated that while he did not necessarily agree with Mr. Farrakhan’s messages either, however, in support of the “basic American right to freedom of speech,” he would support the motion on the floor.
The Board recognized the following speakers who addressed various aspects of this issue: Susan Watson, Jethro Muhammad, Charliese Smith-Muhammad, Edmond Muhammad, Issac Smith-Muhammad, Akil Muhammad, Roosevelt Crosby, and Daryl Muhammad.
Mrs. Stidham stated that she was not sure “ how we can deny them (Pensacola Study Group) access to the facility, whether any of us agree or disagree with what the context is.” She pointed out that many District facilities had been used by churches and other religious organizations to hold worship services and other activities and questioned how “we can say this one group is denied.” She stated that she would support the motion on the floor. Ms. Finkelstein stated that although she disagreed with the message of Mr. Farrakhan, “that absolutely positively does not matter.” She stated “we do have a school board policy, but we also have a Constitution that supersedes school board rules.” At the request of Ms. Finkelstein, Mr. Negron advised that “the courts are clear that the First Amendment forbids government to regulate speech in ways that favor some viewpoints over others. In essence, the school board has created what is called a ‘limited public forum’ which means that you (the Board) allow your school facilities to be used during non-duty hours, so to speak, provided that certain criteria is met (determined by the Superintendent). If that criteria (such as being a non-profit organization) is met, then really your ‘hands are tied’ when it comes to denying the use of these facilities based on viewpoint. The Constitution and the clear weight of the case law tells you that you cannot discriminate regardless of whether or not it is abhorrent, distasteful, pleasant, joyous, happy. If it’s a viewpoint based discrimination, if it’s content-based decision-making, you cannot do it. So my advice to the School Board would be that if this group meets the criteria set forth by the School Board, which is ‘content neutral’ then you should grant them permission to use the facility.” Upon inquiry by Ms. Finkelstein, the Superintendent stated that the group, “in a loose sense,” did meet the criteria set forth. Mrs. Bergosh stated that though she did not agree with the messages of Mr. Farrakhan, she did agree that “we have a right as Americans to share our feelings with others,” and therefore, she would support the motion on the floor. Motion was unanimously approved.
C. ITEMS FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT
1. Student Recommendations
Motion by Dr. DeWitt, seconded by Mrs. Stidham, to approve the Superintendent’s recommendations for student expulsions, Items 1 through 22, with Item 20 requesting a formal hearing, was unanimous.
NOTE: ITEM NUMBER 20 (Student Number 03-122-521), Requests Formal Hearing
(1) Recommend that the indefinite suspension of student number 03-23-561 be terminated and that student be expelled from the public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year with the option to continue in alternative placement.
(2) Recommend that the indefinite suspension of student number 03-43-521 be terminated and that student be expelled from the public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year with the option to continue in alternative placement.
(3) Recommend that the indefinite suspension of student number 03-45-411 be terminated and that student be expelled from the public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year with the option to continue in alternative placement.
(4) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the formal hearing officer, student number 03-49-951 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(5) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the formal hearing officer, student number 03-54-411 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(6) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-67-221 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(7) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-92-561 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(8) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-97-411 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(9) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-98-301 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(10) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-99-301 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(11) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-101-301 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(12) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-102-521 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(13) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-103-521 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(14) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-105-301 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(15) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-107-951 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(16) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-108-281 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(17) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-109-951 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(18) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-110-791 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(19) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-118-1231 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
REQUESTS FORMAL HEARING (20) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-22-521 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(21) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-123-281 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year and all of the 2003-2004 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
(22) Recommend that, consistent with the decision of the due process committee, student number 03-125-281 be expelled from all public schools of Escambia County for the remainder of the 2002-2003 school year. It is further recommended that the student be given the option to enroll, if qualified and if space is available, in an alternative educational program exclusive of regular school placement. Placement to be at the discretion of the Superintendent and to be available as an alternative during the full expulsion time frame.
2. Recommend that employee number 689819 be suspended without pay in accordance with the Return-to-Work Agreement dated January 24, 2003, until the employee fully complies with the Return-to Work Program and is approved to return to work.
Motion was made by Mrs. Stidham, seconded by Dr. DeWitt, to approve the Superintendent’s recommendation that employee number 689819 be suspended without pay in accordance with the Return-to-Work Agreement dated January 24, 2003, until the employee fully complies with the Return-to-Work Program and is approved to return to work. Motion was unanimously approved.
3. Request approval of Board Members for the Foundation for Excellence in Education
Motion by Mrs. Stidham, seconded by Mr. Clark, to approve the Superintendent’s recommendation for two new Board Members, Ms. Sharee Rich and Ms. Dee Ritchie, for the Foundation for Excellence in Education, was unanimously approved.
D. ITEMS FROM THE GENERAL COUNSEL
-No items submitted
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Regular Meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
Attest: Approved:
Superintendent Chair